Monday, March 31, 2008

PS10: A 10 MW SOLAR TOWER POWER PLANT FOR SOUTHERN SPAIN

It is the objective of the PS10 (Planta Solar 10) project to design, construct and operate in a commercial basis a CRS demonstration plant with a design point nominal power of 10 MW, to be installed in Southern Spain and producing electricity in a grid- connected mode and based on the well known PHOEBUS volumetric air technology (Grasse, 1991; Schmitz-Goeb and Keintzel, 1997). The PS10 plant should:

  • Achieve an annual electricity production of 19.2 GWh net (0.22 Capacity Factor with a solar-only operation mode)
  • Validate a first solar tower plant installed cost below $2800/kW
  • The project will make use of existing and well proven technologies like glass-metal heliostats, a volumetric wire-mesh receiver, ceramic-checker storage system and steam generator developed by European companies and already tested and qualified at solar test facility scale in the Plataforma Solar de Almeria within the TSA project (Haeger, 1994).

    Fig. 1.- Process flow diagram of the PS10 solar tower power plant
    Fig. 1.- Process flow diagram of the PS10 solar tower power plant

    Table 1

    The PS10 plant will be located in the estate of Casa Quemada (37.2º Latitude) and nearby the town Sanlucar la Mayor, 15 km West from the city of Seville. The plant will be a solar-only system to comply with Spanish regulations. The system will make use of 981 heliostats developed by INABENSA, a 90 m high tower, a 33 MWhth heat storage system and an integrated volumetric air receiver design of 173 m2 developed by the German company Steinmüller (table 1). The basic configuration of PS10 plant consists of a heliostat field (north shape), volumetric air receiver, steam generator, solid heat storage module, EGPS, two blowers and corresponding air ducts and dampers (See fig. 1). Heliostat field layout, tower height and receiver configuration have been optimized by using the code WDELSOL. Insolation is concentrated by means of the heliostat field onto a receiver (80515 m2 mirrors). The heliostat Sanlucar-90 will be used for the PS10 plant and basically it consists of an enlarged version of the successful COLON heliostat of 70 m2 developed by INABENSA (Silva, Blanco and Ruiz, 1999).
    The receiver must supply the power for feeding the steam generator and has been designed for a solar multiple of 1.15. Receiver shape is sectional cylindrical. The absorber of the volumetric receiver is made of wire mesh hexagonal modules. Design point technical specifications for the receiver are: Air mass flow: 63.1 kg/s; Air outlet temperature: 680 ºC; Air return ratio: 45%; Receiver thermal efficiency: 90%; Air missing losses: 8%. The PS10 thermal storage consists of a packed bed of ceramic 15-mm cordierite spheres embedded in an internally insulated cylindrical vessel. The main storage data are:

  • Useful storage energy 33 MWh (45 MWh gross)
  • Temperature hot/cold side: 675 ºC / 110 ºC
  • Storage diameter: 8.3 m
  • Storage material height: 5.6 m
  • Storage vessel height: 10 m
  • Storage volume net: 305 m3 (345 tons)
  • The steam generator is a meander-type tube bundle with natural circulation. Steam (10.73 kg/s) will be produced at 460 ºC and 65 bar. Turbine generator will produce 11 MWe gross and 10 MWe net with 30% efficiency. Heliostat field aiming strategy has been carefully analyzed with HELIOS code (Vittitoe, Biggs and Lighthill, 1978) in order to preserve flux distribution onto the absorber. Flux requirements are as follows and could be simulated with as many as 38 aiming points:

  • Mean flux on absorber surface: 350 kW/m2
  • Absorber edge flux: 180 kW/m2
  • Maximum flux on absorber surface: 800 kW/m2
  • Design point thermal outlet efficiency from solar to turbine is 54% and the total conversion efficiency solar to net electric grid is 13.2%. The system is penalized by the turbine size and its corresponding efficiency (30%). At design point conditions, the solar receiver will load about 5 MW into the storage system. Annual performance as predicted by SOLERGY (Stoddard et al., 1987) should produce 22.1 GWh gross (12% efficiency) and 19.2 GWh net (10.5% efficiency), being equivalent to almost 2000 hours of equivalent nominal production (22% Capacity Factor).
    Receiver thermal outlet moves between 200 MWh in wintertime and 325 MWh in summer time. Considering the power block conversions, the power production per day goes to 100 MWh.
    Heat storage at PS10 has as main objective to facilitate the operability of the plant as a solar-only system. A 1-hour equivalent heat storage system has been considered enough to guarantee such operability. In wintertime or with cloud transients, about 5 to 6 hours of nominal power can be supplied to the turbine. The number of operation hours for the turbine in a typical summer sunny day may go up to 10 to 12 hours.
    The PS10 project will be managed following the typical work program of most conventional thermal power plants (Falcone, 1986). Solar specificity is basically influencing the initial definition phase (already completed), like specifying a design point and a solar multiple, and selection of the site. PS10 is promoted by the ABENGOA company through the IPP Sanlucar Solar. The INABENSA company acts as single prime construction manager and as Coordinator for the EC demonstration PS10 project. The RTD project is managed by a Consortium formed by four Partners. In addition two main subcontractors are considered relevant for the success of the project. INABENSA will be responsible for supply and assembling of BOP and heliostat field and assembly of receiver system+heat storage+steam generator. In addition INABENSA will contract to external subcontractors the supply of receiver subsystem (STEINMÜLLER), master control and electric power generation system (ABENER). Detailed engineering will be jointly performed by the partners Fichtner, CIEMAT and DLR. Training operation and evaluation will be conducted by a team formed by two partners –CIEMAT and DLR- and one subcontractor –AICIA-.

    COSTS PS10Investment (Thousand $)
    General Coordination 178
    Civil Works657
    Heliostats 9,678
    Tower 1,876
    Receiver+Storage+Steam Gen.     9,581
    EPGS 4,803
    Control 781
    TOTAL 27,553

    Once PS10 is completed, it will be hired to the Sanlucar Solar IPP society already registered for commercial exploitation during the operation/evaluation phase and beyond the scope of the EC project.
    Project costs amount to 28 million dollar (see table) and lead to a typical LEC of $0.18/kWh. The small size of the plant and the pure solar design make necessary the existence of a public economical support through investment subsidies (both European and National) and a special tariff for the electricity produced. At present a 5 million-dollar investment subsidy has been obtained from the EC RTD ENERGIE Programme and additional subsidies are under negotiation through the Ministry of Industry and Energy in Spain. The Spanish ROYAL DECREE 2818/1998 of December 23, 1998, on the electricity production by facilities powered by renewable energy sources offers a green price between $0.11 and $0.22/kWh for the generated electricity that opens a unique opportunity to start the market introduction of solar thermal power plant technology in under commercial conditions. Eventual figures of investment subsidies and premium electricity selling price are still a matter of negotiation between PS10 promoters and the Spanish Administration.


    Sunday, March 30, 2008

    Solar Millennium AG acquires shares in the Andasol 3 project from NEO EnergÜ­a's

    Solar Millennium AG / Strategic Company Decision/Miscellaneous

    28.03.2008

    Release of a Corporate News, transmitted by DGAP - a company of EquityStory AG. The issuer / publisher is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    • Construction due to start in May 2008 • Timely involvement by major investor • Consequent pursuing of the growth strategy

    Erlangen (Germany), 28.03.2008 Today, Solar Millennium (ISIN DE0007218406) has acquired a 50 percent share of the project company Marquesado Solar S.L. from NEO EnergÜ­a's, a subsidiary of Energias de Portugal S.A. (EDP). It has been agreed by the parties that details of the acquisition contract remain confidential. Following the acquisition of the shares, Solar Millennium will be accelerating the realization of its related Andasol 3 project.

    The technology for Andasol 3 is to be provided by the Solar Millennium subsidiary Flagsol GmbH in Cologne. The Solar Millennium group is to be, besides others, in charge of building the power plant, an unprecedented undertaking by the group to date. Confirmation of project financing is expected shortly from the banks, with construction due to start in May 2008. Another major investor is to take the place of NEO EnergÜ­a as project partner in the Andasol 3 project.

    Located at the foot of the Sierra Nevada in Andalusia in southern Spain, Andasol 3 is the third parabolic trough power plant to be developed by Solar Millennium. This location is ideally suited for solar thermal power plants. Construction of the sister projects Andasol 1 and 2 is already underway. Andasol 1, Europe's first parabolic trough power plant, is to be connected to the grid in summer 2008. Andasol 2 will also begin operation at the start of 2009. With a collector surface area of 510,000 square meters each, equal to the area of 70 football fields, these are the world's largest solar power plants. The 300 million euro projects each have a gross annual output of around 180 gigawatt hours of electricity, supplying up to 200,000 people. With the use of thermal storage the power plants are also able to provide dependable electricity supplies after the sun has set.

    Christian Beltle, chairman of the Solar Millennium board, is very pleased: 'We will begin realizing the Andasol 3 solar power plant project shortly, thereby remaining within our forecasts for the current fiscal year. With Andasol 3, in addition to providing the project development and the technology, the Solar Millennium group will also be taking on responsibility for power plant construction for the first time. We are therefore consistently pursuing our growth strategy'.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Information and Explaination of the Issuer to this News:

    About Solar Millennium AG: Solar Millennium AG, Erlangen, is a globally active company in the renewable energy sector, with its main focus on solar thermal power plants. Together with its subsidiaries, Solar Millennium specializes in parabolic trough power plants - a reliable, proven technology in which the company is a worldwide leader. The company covers all major business sectors of the value-added chain for solar thermal power plants, from project development to technology and turn-key construction of power plants, to the operation and ownership of power plants. In Spain, Solar Millennium developed Europe's first ever parabolic trough power plants, two of which are already under construction. Further projects are planned with a capacity of several hundred Megawatts located worldwide, with the focus upon Spain, the USA, China and North Africa. The company is also developing solar chimney power plants, with the aim of making this technology ready for the market.

    About the technology: Solar thermal power plants generate electricity using heat energy captured from solar radiation. In a parabolic trough power plant, trough-shaped mirrors concentrate the sun's rays onto a pipe in the focal line of the collector. Their absorption heats a transfer fluid in the pipe, generating steam in the power block by way of heat exchange. As with conventional power plants, the steam is utilized in a turbine to generate power, and by integrating thermal storage, this power can be supplied on demand. Thus, solar power plants can also generate electricity after sunset.

    Contact: Solar Millennium AG Sven Moormann Telefon/phone: (09131) 9409-0 presse@SolarMillennium.de investor@SolarMillennium.de www.SolarMillennium.de 28.03.2008 Financial News transmitted by DGAP

    Saturday, March 29, 2008

    INSTALLATION OF 9 SOLAR ENERGY PLANTS


    Friday, March 28, 2008
      Ministry of New and Renewable Energy
     
     
    INSTALLATION OF 9 SOLAR ENERGY PLANTS IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE COUNTRY DURING LAST YEAR

     
      16:52 IST  
     
      The Ministry of New & Renewable Energy promoted deployment of 9 Solar Energy Plants during 2007-08 in 6 States of the Country. Out of this, Maharashtra tops the list with 3 Plants where as, Jammu & Kashmir got two such plants. Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Orissa and West Bengal each got one power plant during this period. The total capacity sanctioned for these plants is less than 2000 kWp. The capacity under implementation is more than 800 kWp.

    Out of different Plant Projects, all the 6 states have received one Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant Project. The state of West Bengal has been sanctioned highest capacity of 945.0 kWp followed by Chhattisgarh with 646.8 kWp. Besides these, Jammu & Kashmir and Maharashtra, each have been sanctioned Building Integrated Photovoltaic Power Plants (BIPV) with total sanctioned capacity of 18 kWp and one each SPV Power Pack of total sanctioned capacity of 8 kWp.

    The Ministry is promoting deployment of solar photovoltaic power packs/plants in different parts of the country under various programmes including remote village electrification programme by providing partial financial support. These projects are implemented through the state implementing agencies in their respective states. The total funds released to the state agencies are to the tune of Rs. 40 crores which includes funds for four ongoing projects also. These projects are likely to be completed during 2008-09.

    The projects for installation of solar photovoltaic power packs/plants are considered by the Ministry on the basis of proposals submitted by the States, as per provisions of the scheme, and availability of funds.

    KP/Hb
     
     

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008

    Let's build up steam for thermal solar power

    JOHN KROMKO
    Tucson Citizen
    Arizona Public Service recently announced that it will contract to build a huge thermal solar energy plant near Gila Bend.
    The plant will produce 280 mega (million) watts, enough to supply 70,000 homes. That's some serious energy.
    For decades, hopes for alternative energy have been raised and dashed, over and over.
    This plant, which will start producing electrical power by 2011, is the grail so many have sought. This is an alternative energy project that will actually work.
    Thermal installations use the sun's heat to generate electricity, while photovoltaic systems convert the sun's light into electricity. The thermal process is much more efficient and economically feasible. Oil and natural gas can produce a kilowatt of electricity for about 10.5 cents, solar thermal can do it for about 13 cents, and photovoltaic costs about 30 cents.
    I've put up solar panels, built a windmill, installed solar water heaters and picked jojoba beans for alternative diesel fuel. But nothing ever worked in a way that was economically feasible for large-scale use.
    Dreaming and believing is good but, being a former engineer, I understand that when the physics just isn't there, reality has to be faced.
    Wanting to believe too much makes us vulnerable to pandering politicians, media that don't investigate and flimflam artists looking for a quick buck. It can be a perfect storm.
    A clear example is the ethanol disaster. Ethanol producing facilities have been built throughout the Midwest, and politicians, the media and citizens all fell for the scam.
    The diversion of corn to subsidized ethanol production is the major cause of the rapid food price inflation now ravaging our country.
    A little research and honesty would have shown that corn cannot economically produce motor vehicle fuel because the process takes more energy than is produced. Consumers and taxpayers will pay dearly for years to come.
    Hydrogen power, often sensationalized by the media, can be used on spaceships and car prototypes, where cost is no object. But again, it takes more energy to produce hydrogen than the hydrogen contains.
    About 30 years ago, a flash flood of solar energy fervor swept through Arizona. It was a feeding frenzy as solar installers sprung up to spend the free subsidy money.
    But in less than a decade, the installers had all but disappeared, and virtually none of the solar installations survived. Hundreds of millions of dollars were squandered. We can't let such things happen again.
    Residential use of photovoltaic cells should be encouraged because it is truly benefits the environment. But neither taxpayers nor ratepayers should be forced to subsidize it.
    Given current technology, the panels will never pay for themselves. Lack of payback may not be important to an individual homeowner, but society can't justify the tax and rebate system that transfers wealth from generally poorer people to generally richer people.
    Instead, that subsidy money should be put toward development and construction of more Gila Bend-type facilities that will benefit everyone.
    Thermal technology is far more cost-efficient and will actually return the investment.
    A conventional power plant uses natural gas or coal to boil water, driving a steam turbine, which turns an electrical generator.
    In a thermal solar plant, mirrors focus the sun's heat to boil water, and the rest of the operation is like a conventional plant. The technology is much more robust and permanent than photovoltaic technology.
    The Spanish company that will build the plant has just finished one near Boulder City and has considerable experience.
    But it's tragic that a state with lofty solar aspirations can't get the job done locally. It's not rocket science. The technology has been around a long time. Tucson Electric Power operated a smaller thermal plant 80 years ago.
    Everyone who supports solar should urge our governor, corporation commissioners, legislators and members of Congress to stop all of the nickel-and-dime rebates and subsidies that will ultimately dissipate massive amounts of money. If all of these funds were combined, we'd be well on our way to solar world leadership.
    The Legislature can easily create a sports authority. Why not a power plant authority?
    Our members of Congress should carve out an exemption for our uniquely qualified solar state, so federal alternative energy subsidies go to our power authority.
    A publicly owned solar power authority would be a true gift to our state. Our taxpayers, businesses and ratepayers would have an advantage for years.
    Solar thermal plants produce no pollution, and, after the plant is built, the fuel is free. Let's get to work, Arizona.
    John Kromko is a community and environmental activist who served in the Legislature for 14 years.

    Tuesday, March 25, 2008

    The S-Curve Framework

    The S-Curve emerged as a mathematical model and was afterwards applied to a variety of fields including physics, biology and economics. It describes for example the development of the embryo, the diffusion of viruses, the utility gained by people as the number of consumption choices increases, and so on.

    In the innovation management field the S-Curve illustrates the introduction, growth and maturation of innovations as well as the technological cycles that most industries experience. In the early stages large amounts of money, effort and other resources are expended on the new technology but small performance improvements are observed. Then, as the knowledge about the technology accumulates, progress becomes more rapid. As soon as major technical obstacles are overcome and the innovation reaches a certain adoption level an exponential growth will take place. During this phase relatively small increments of effort and resources will result in large performance gains. Finally, as the technology starts to approach its physical limit, further pushing the performance becomes increasingly difficult, as the figure below shows.

    Consider the supercomputer industry, where the traditional architecture involved single microprocessors. In the early stages of this technology a huge amount of money was spent in research and development, and it required several years to produce the first commercial prototype. Once the technology reached a certain level of development the know-how and expertise behind supercomputers started to spread, boosting dramatically the speed at which those systems evolved. After some time, however, microprocessors started to yield lower and lower performance gains for a given time/effort span, suggesting that the technology was close to its physical limit (based on the ability to squeeze transistors in the silicon wafer). In order to solve the problem supercomputer producers adopted a new architecture composed of many microprocessors working in parallel. This innovation created a new S-curve, shifted to the right of the original one, with a higher performance limit (based instead on the capacity to co-ordinate the work of the single processors).

    Usually the S-curve is represented as the variation of performance in function of the time/effort. Probably that is the most used metric because it is also the easiest to collect data for. This fact does not imply, however, that performance is more accurate than the other possible metrics, for instance the number of inventions, the level of the overall research, or the profitability associated with the innovation.

    One must be careful with the fact that different performance parameters tend to be used over different phases of the innovation, as a result the outcomes may get mixed together, or one parameter will end up influencing the outcome of another. Civil aircraft provides a good example, on early stages of the industry fuel burn was a negligible parameter, and all the emphasis was on the speed aircrafts could achieve and if they would thus be able to get off the ground safely. Over the time, with the improvement of the aircrafts almost everyone was able to reach the minimum speed and to take off, which made fuel burn the main parameter for assessing performance of civil aircrafts.

    Overall we can say that the S-Curve is a robust yet flexible framework to analyze the introduction, growth and maturation of innovations and to understand the technological cycles. The model also has plenty of empirical evidence, it was exhaustively studied within many industries including semiconductors, telecommunications, hard drives, photocopiers, jet engines and so on.

    Solar Energy Fact Sheets

    Informative Fact Sheets about Solar Thermal Energy

    Solar: Solar Thermal: Making Electricity From The Sun's Heat

    • Solar thermal electric power plant generates heat by using lenses and reflectors to concentrate the sun's energy. Because the heat can be stored, these plants are unique because they can generate power when it is needed, day or night, rain or shine.

    • Solar thermal electric systems operating in the US today [Solar Parabolic Troughs] meet the needs of over 350,000 people (equal to the population of the city of Fresno, CA or Miami, FL) and displace the equivalent of 2.3 million barrels of oil annually.

    • Solar thermal power plants create two and one-half times as many skilled, high paying jobs as do conventional power plants that use fossil fuels.

    • A CEC (California Energy Commission) study shows that even with existing tax credits, a solar thermal electric plant pays about 1.7 times more in federal, state, and local taxes than an equivalent natural gas combined cycle plant. If the plants paid the same level of taxes, their cost of electricity would be roughly the same.

    • Solar Two, a "power tower" electricity generating plant in California, is a 10-megawatt prototype for large-scale commercial power plants. It stores the sun's energy in molten salt at 1050 degrees F, which allows the plant to generate power day and night, rain or shine. Construction was completed in March 1996, and it is now in its three year operating and testing phase. (source: Southern California Edison)

    • Over 700 megawatts of solar thermal electric systems should be deployed by the year 2003 in the U.S. and internationally. The market for these systems should exceed 5,000 megawatts by 2010, enough to serve the residential needs of 7 million people (larger than the state of Georgia) which will save the energy equivalent of 46 million barrels of oil per year.

    • Utilizing only 1% of the earth's deserts to produce clean solar electric energy would provide more electricity than is currently being produced on the entire planet by fossil fuels.

    • The sun's heat can be collected in a variety of different ways: Solar Parabolic Troughs consist of curved mirrors which form troughs that focus the sun's energy on a pipe. A fluid, typically oil, is circulated through the pipes which is used to drive a conventional generator to create electricity. Solar Parabolic Dish systems consist of a parabolic-shaped concentrator (similar in shape to a satellite dish) that reflects solar radiation onto a receiver mounted at the focal point at the center. The collected heat is utilized directly by a heat engine mounted on the receiver which generates electricity. Solar Central Receivers or "Power Towers" consist of a tower surrounded by a large array of heliostats. Heliostats are mirrors that track the sun and reflect its rays onto the receiver, which absorbs the heat energy that is then utilized in driving a turbine electric generator.

    Comparison of Major Solar Thermal Technologies (tower,dish, trough)

      Power
    Tower
    Parabolic
    Dish
    Parabolic
    Trough
    Applications Grid-connected electric plants; process heat for industrial use. Stand-alone small power systems; grid support Grid-connected electric plants; process heat for industrial use.
    Advantages Dispatchable base load electricity; high conversion efficiencies; energy storage; hybrid (solar/fossil) operation. Dispatchable electricity, high conversion efficiencies; modularity; hybrid (solar/fossil) operation. Dispatchable peaking electricity; commercially available with 4,500 Gwh operating experience; hybrid (solar/fossil) operation.

    [Source: Status Report on Solar Thermal Power Plants. Pilkington Solar International GmbH: Cologne, Germany,1996.]

     

    The German solar thermal power plant industry

    Solar thermal power plants utilise the sun's energy to generate electricity in industrial-scale systems.

    The technology at a glance

    Functional principle of the solar dish

    There is a basic distinction between solar thermal power plants that concentrate direct solar radiation and those that don't. With parabolic trough, solar tower and solar dish systems, the direct radiation is concentrated using reflectors. The energy concentrated in this way is transformed into steam, which is used to drive conventional electricity generators.

    The solar array of a parabolic trough power plant consists of several rows of collectors, 20 to 150 metres in length, which are made of parabolically curved reflectors. These concentrate the sunlight onto an absorber tube that runs along a caustic line. The solar radiation concentrated in the absorber tubes heats water via a heat exchanger to temperatures of around 400 degrees Celsius. The resulting water vapour drives a generator, as with conventional steam or gas turbine power plants. Parabolic trough power plants, as the currently least expensive variant of solar electricity generation, are the only type of solar thermal power plants operating competitively anywhere in the world. They have been producing electricity at competitive prices for more than 15 years. The last of a total of nine power plants constructed in the Mojave desert in southern California was completed in 1991. To date, these plants have generated 10 TWh of solar power. The first European plant, in Andalusia in the south of Spain, will go into operation in 2009. Three power generation units, each with a 50 megawatt capacity and a collector surface area of 512,000 square metres, will supply environmentally-friendly electricity to 200,000 people. Several German firms are instrumental in planning and implementing the project.

    Functional principle of the parabolic trough
    Functional principle of the solar tower

    So-called Fresnel collectors are also undergoing practical trials as part of the development of parabolic troughs. With these collectors, reflectors arranged in facets concentrate the solar energy, which directly heats and vaporises the water in the absorber tube. Due to a secondary reflector above the absorber tube, these systems require a smaller reflector surface area for the same output. Several hundred megawatts of electricity can be produced in this way.

    In solar tower power plants, the solar radiation is concentrated onto a central heat exchanger/absorber by hundreds of reflectors that position themselves automatically. Temperatures can reach up to 1,300 °C - significantly higher values than with parabolic trough collectors. Process heat can be generated to practically any temperature and used for chemical processes. However, the heat created inside the absorber is generally used to generate electricity via a steam or gas turbine power plant.  Europe's first commercial solar tower power plant was constructed near Seville, Spain in 2006, and achieves an output of 11 MW. Another 20 MW tower is planned for construction by 2008. Other international projects led by German companies are currently in the planning stage. In mid-2006, in Jülich, Germany, building work was started on a solar tower power plant that will be operational in 2008 and provide an output of
    1.5 megawatts.

    With solar dish power plants, a parabolically curved reflector that can turn on two axes reflects the sun's rays onto a thermal receiver positioned at the focal point. This can generate temperatures up to 1,000 degrees Celsius. Oil is a typical medium used to transfer these high temperatures, by means
    of which water vapour is generated, driving the turbines in the electricity generator. The electrical output of individual reflectors varies between 10 and 50 kilowatts per system, and the same applies to larger arrays.

    With the so-called Dish-Stirling systems, a Stirling engine is connected downstream of the thermal receiver, which, in this case, is a dish. The engine converts the thermal energy directly into mechanical work or electricity. With these systems, efficiency levels of more than 30 % can be reached. There are example prototypes installed at the Plataforma Solar in Almería, Spain. These systems are suitable for stand-alone operation. They also offer the possibility of connecting up several individual installations to create a solar farm, and can thus cover an electricity requirement of between 10 kW and several MW.

    Solar thermal power plants without concentration of direct solar radiation represent another technical variation. In a so-called solar chimney power plant, air is heated by direct solar radiation beneath a large roofed surface, which has an air-tight connection to a chimney situated at its centre. The heated air flows upwards through the chimney via air ducts at the bottom. This updraft drives one or more wind turbines and the generator attached to them, which converts kinetic energy into electrical energy. The low level of technical complexity of such systems is reflected in a comparatively low efficiency level of around one percent. A German-planned solar chimney power plant with an output of 200 MW will be completed in Australia by 2008.

    Regulatory framework

    Electricity cost of solar thermal power systems as a function of cumulative installed capacity
    SEGS stands for 9 parabolic trough power plants built between 1984 and 1991 in the California desert. Total power: 354 MWe
    AndaSol: Parabolic trough power plant project in Spain with 50 MW power each (beginning of construction in 2005)

    The German government has been supporting the development of solar thermal power plants for several years, with the result that Germany is now global leader in the research and development of this technology. German companies are supplying all essential components, such as the precision reflectors for parabolic trough power plants. Valuable experience has been gained in the construction and operation of various pioneer solar thermal power plants, which were either German-led projects or projects with German involvement. The funding of solar thermal power plant technology is currently on the increase in many other parts of the world. Thanks to sophisticated heat storage systems, solar thermal power plants can now be used around the clock. Further research on heat storage tanks will therefore be worthwhile. A further advantage is that these systems can easily be combined with conventional power plants.

    Outlook

    Solar thermal power plants will play an important role in global energy supply in the future. By 2050, 15 % of European electricity demand could be covered by solar power plants in North Africa and the Middle East. With the right pipe infrastructure, more efficient electricity transmission would also be possible. The energy could be distributed all over the world in the form of hydrogen. There are already many new projects in planning or underway, led by or involving German firms, particularly in south-west USA, North Africa and Spain.

    Prospects For Solar Thermal Power

    A  new solar thermal electric power installation in Boulder City Nevada uses arrays of mirrors to concentrate sun light to drive electric power generation. The cost of electricity for this plant is estimated at 15-20 cents per kilowatt-hour (kwh).

    Many states, including California, are imposing mandates for renewable energy. All of that is reviving interest in solar thermal plants.

    The power they produce is still relatively expensive. Industry experts say the plant here produces power at a cost per kilowatt- hour of 15 to 20 cents. With a little more experience and some economies of scale, that could fall to about 10 cents, according to a recent report by Emerging Energy Research, a consulting firm in Cambridge, Mass. Newly built coal-fired plants are expected to produce power at about 7 cents per kilowatt-hour or more if carbon is taxed.

    That is at least double what cheaper sources of electricity cost in the United States. Can the costs really go down substantially with a bigger market?

    While solar thermal still costs more than wind power predictable daylight hours and the ability to store the heat allows solar thermal to provide a more reliable power source.

    According to the U.S. Department of Energy, wind power costs about 8 cents per kilowatt, while solar thermal power costs 13 to 17 cents. But power from wind farms fluctuates with every gust and lull; solar thermal plants, on the other hand, capture solar energy as heat, which is much easier to store than electricity. Utilities can dispatch this stored solar energy when they need it--whether or not the sun happens to be shining.

    Solar thermal doesn't have to be able to provide electric power 24 hours per day to be useful. If its cost could drop in half then solar thermal would greatly reduce the use of coal and natural gas and allow limited fossil fuels to last longer and pollute less..

    One solar thermal facility in Nevada is claimed to use 400 acres for enough electricity to power 14,000 homes.

    Acciona's plant, which began operation last year, produces 64 megawatts of electricity for the utility company Nevada Power, enough to light up 14,000 homes. The company's Spanish competitor Abengoa just announced a plan to build a 280-megawatt solar thermal plant outside Phoenix, which would be the largest such project in the world.

    All you need is a lot of sun, a lot of space and a lot of mirrors — and NS1 has all of the above. 182,000 parabolic mirrors are spread over 400 acres of flat desert, creating a glistening sea of glass visible from miles away.

    That's 35 homes worth of electric power per acre of land. Mind you, this is an area of the United States that gets above average amounts of sunlight. But this result suggests that use of solar thermal to power all homes would not use an inordinate amount of land - at least not in countries with lower population densities.

    Solar thermal looks cheaper than solar photovoltaics and the heat from solar thermal can be stored to stretch into evening hours. But solar photovoltaics might have better prospects for lower cost reductions and it lends itself more easily to decentralized use and smaller installations on homes and other buildings.

    By Randall Parker at 2008 March 06

    Storing Solar Power Efficiently

    Storing Solar Power Efficiently
    Thermal-power plants could solve some of the problems with solar power by turning sunlight into steam and storing heat for cloudy days.

    By Peter Fairley

    Thursday, September 27, 2007

    Solar proponents love to boast that just a few hundred square kilometers' worth of photovoltaic solar panels installed in Southwestern deserts could power the United States. Their schemes come with a caveat, of course: without backup power plants or expensive investments in giant batteries, flywheels, or other energy-storage systems, this solar-power supply would fluctuate wildly with each passing cloud (not to mention with the sun's daily rise and fall and seasonal ebbs and flows). Solar-power startup Ausra, based in Palo Alto, thinks it has the solution: solar-thermal-power plants that turn sunlight into steam and efficiently store heat for cloudy days.

    "Fossil-fuel proponents often say that solar can't do the job, that solar can't run at night, solar can't run the economy," says David Mills, Ausra's founder and chairman. "That's true if you don't have storage." He says that solar-thermal plants are the solution because storing heat is much easier than storing electricity. Mills estimates that, thanks to that advantage, solar-thermal plants capable of storing 16 hours' worth of heat could provide more than 90 percent of current U.S. power demand at prices competitive with coal and natural gas. "There's almost no limit to how much you can put into the grid," he says.

    Major utilities are buying the idea. In July, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) signed a 25-year deal with Ausra competitor Solel Solar Systems of Beit Shemesh, Israel, to buy power from a 553-megawatt solar-thermal plant that Solel is developing in California's Mojave Desert. The plant will supply 400,000 homes in northern and central California when it is completed in 2011. Florida Power & Light, meanwhile, hired Solel to upgrade the 1980s-era solar-thermal plants it operates in the Mojave.

    Ausra, meanwhile, is negotiating with PG&E to supply power from a 175-megawatt plant that it plans to build in California, for which it secured $40 million in venture financing this month.

    What distinguishes Ausra's design is its relative simplicity. In conventional solar-thermal plants such as Solel's, a long trough of parabolic mirrors focuses sunlight on a tube filled with a heat-transfer fluid, often some sort of oil or brine.

    The fluid, in turn, produces steam to drive a turbine and produce electricity. Ausra's solar collectors employ mass-produced and thus cheaper flat mirrors, and they focus light onto tubes filled with water, thus directly producing steam.

    Ausra's collectors produce less power, but that power costs less to produce.

    One megawatt's worth of Ausra's solar collectors has been producing steam in New South Wales, Australia, since 2004; the steam is fed into the turbines of a primarily coal-fired power plant. The final piece of the system--a proprietary heat-energy-storage system--should be ready by 2009.

    Mills will not say what material his company's system will heat, although several recent solar-thermal plants by Ausra competitors--including one in Nevada that started up this summer and two under construction in Spain near Granada--plan to use molten-salt storage. Molten salts are inexpensive salt solutions that absorb considerable energy when they melt and give up that energy when they freeze.

    What Mills can say for certain is that Ausra's storage system will lower its power-generation costs. That is a surprising statement since energy storage can as much as double the cost of electricity from photovoltaics or wind turbines.

    Heat storage is more efficient than electricity storage: just 2 to 7 percent of the energy is lost when heat is banked in a storage system, compared with losses of at least 15 percent when energy is stored in a battery. More important, says Mills, is the fact that storage enables thermal plants to use cheaper turbines.

    The bottom line is that Mills vows that adding storage plus savings from economies of scale and lower cost of capital (as banks become familiar with solar-thermal technology) will cut Ausra's current 10 to 11 cents per kilowatt-hour cost of power in half. By 2010, he expects solar thermal to provide California with baseline power cheaper than natural gas, currently set by the state at 9.2 cents per kilowatt-hour.

    Why has solar-thermal power received little attention from the energy-storage community despite such promise? John Boyes, manager of the Energy Storage & Distributed Energy Resources at Sandia National Laboratories, in Albuquerque, NM, says that solar thermal is viable but inflexible compared with other means of storing energy, such as, say, coupling wind farms to large batteries, flywheels, and supercapacitors that can be placed almost anywhere on a power grid. "You can store energy anywhere you have electricity and a little bit of floor space," says Boyes.

    The footprint of Ausra's planned 175-megawatt plant will be, in contrast, about one square mile.

    Monday, March 24, 2008

    Solar Thermal Project, Mathania, Rajasthan

    Serious Megawatts

    India Building Large-Scale Solar Thermal Capacity

    By Gordon Feller
    October 2, 2002
    Rajastan, India

    Parabolic Trough Array
    Brighton, Colorado, USA
    photo: US D.O.E.

    Editor's Note: Just as on a small scale, hybrid engines stretch a
    gallon of gas, in the same manner a hybrid power plant can stretch its
    own supply of fossil fuel. In India, a huge new power station using
    hybrid systems is close to completing their financing and breaking
    ground in the sunny state of Rajasthan. This fossil fuel / solar
    hybrid will produce a whopping 140 megawatts of electric power, and 40
    of those megawatts will be produced from a field of solar thermal
    parabolic troughs. Not as glamorous as photovoltaics, but still much
    more cost-effective, parabolic systems use mirrors to focus sunlight
    that in turn heats a thermal media (gas, steam) to drive a turbine
    generator. The project described below is projected to go in at about
    US $1 million per megawatt, which is competitive with conventional
    fuels. Read on...

    India's power sector has a total installed capacity of approximately
    102,000 MW of which 60% is coal-based, 25% hydro, and the balance gas
    and nuclear-based. Power shortages are estimated at about 11% of total
    energy and 15% of peak capacity requirements and are likely to
    increase in the coming years. In the next 10 years, another 10,000 MW
    of capacity is required. The bulk of capacity additions involve coal
    thermal stations supplemented by hydroelectric plant development.
    Coal-based power involve environmental concerns relating to emissions
    of suspended particulate matter (SPM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrous
    oxide, carbon dioxide, methane and other gases. On the other hand,
    large hydroplants can lead to soil degradation and erosion, loss of
    forests, wildlife habitat and species diversity and most importantly,
    the displacement of people. To promote environmentally sound energy
    investments as well as help mitigate the acute shortfall in power
    supply, the Government of India is promoting the accelerated
    development of the country's renewable energy resources and has made
    it a priority thrust area under India's National Environmental Action
    Plan (NEAP).

    The Indian government estimates that a potential of 50,000 MW of power
    capacity can be harnessed from new and renewable energy sources but
    due to relatively high development cost experienced in the past these
    were not tapped as aggressively as conventional sources. Nevertheless,
    development of alternate energy has been part of India's strategy for
    expanding energy supply and meeting decentralized energy needs of the
    rural sector. The program, considered one of the largest among
    developing countries, is administered through India's Ministry of
    Non-Conventional Energy Sources (MNES), energy development agencies in
    the various States, and the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency
    Limited (IREDA).

    Parabolic Dish Array
    Rajasthan, India
    photo: UNESCO
    Throughout the 1990's, India's private sector interest in renewable
    energy increased due to several factors: (i) India opened the power
    sector to private sector participation in 1991; (ii) tax incentives
    are now offered to developers of renewable energy systems; (iii) there
    has been a heightened awareness of the environmental benefits of
    renewable energy relative to conventional forms and of the
    short-gestation period for developing alternate energy schemes.
    Recognizing the opportunities afforded by private sector
    participation, the Indian Government revised its priorities in July
    1993 by giving greater emphasis on promoting renewable energy
    technologies for power generation. To date, over 1,500 MW of windfarm
    capacity has been commissioned and about 1,423 MW capacity of small
    hydro installed. The sector's contribution to energy supply has grown
    from 0.4% of India's power capacity in 1995 to 3.4% by 2001.

    India is located in the equatorial sun belt of the earth, thereby
    receiving abundant radiant energy from the sun. The India
    Meteorological Department maintains a nationwide network of radiation
    stations which measure solar radiation and also the daily duration of
    sunshine. In most parts of India, clear sunny weather is experienced
    250 to 300 days a year. The annual global radiation varies from 1600
    to 2200 kWh/sq.m. which is comparable with radiation received in the
    tropical and sub-tropical regions. The equivalent energy potential is
    about 6,000 million GWh of energy per year. The highest annual global
    radiation is received in Rajasthan and northern Gujarat. In Rajasthan,
    large areas of land are barren and sparsely populated, making these
    areas suitable as locations for large central power stations based on
    solar energy.

    The main objectives of the project are these: (i) To demonstrate the
    operational viability of parabolic trough solar thermal power
    generation in India; (ii) support solar power technology development
    to help lead to a reduction in production cost; and (iii) help reduce
    greenhouse gas (GHG) global emissions in the longer term.
    Specifically, operational viability will be demonstrated through
    operation of a solar thermal plant with commercial power sales and
    delivery arrangements with the grid. Technology development would be
    supported through technical assistance and training. The project would
    be pursued under The World Bank's Global Environment Fund (GEF) --
    which has a leading program objective focused on climate change. This
    project is envisaged as the first step of a long term program for
    promoting solar thermal power in India that would lead to a phased
    deployment of similar systems in the country and possibly in other
    developing nations.

    India supports development of both solar thermal and solar
    photovoltaics (PV) power generation. To demonstrate and commercialize
    solar thermal technology in India, MNES is promoting megawatt scale
    projects such as the proposed 35MW solar thermal plant in Rajasthan
    and is encouraging private sector projects by providing financial
    assistance from the Ministry.

    One of the prime objectives of the demonstration project is to ensure
    capacity build-up through 'hands on' experience in the design,
    operation and management of such projects under actual field
    conditions. Involvement in the project of various players in the
    energy sector, such as local industries, the private construction and
    operations contractors, Rajasthan State Power Corporation Limited
    (RSPCL), Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB), Rajasthan Energy
    Development Agency (REDA), Central Electricity Authority (CEA), MNES
    and others, will help to increase the capacity and capability of local
    technical expertise and further sustain the development of solar power
    in India in the longer term.

    The project's sustainability will depend on to what extent the impact
    of the initial investment cost is mitigated, operating costs fully
    recovered, professional management introduced, and infrastructure and
    equipment support for operation and maintenance made accessible.
    Accordingly, while the solar thermal station will be state-owned, it
    will be operated during the initial five years under a management
    contract with the private sector; subsidy support will be limited to
    capital costs. Fuel input, power supply and other transactions would
    be on a commercial basis and backed up by acceptable marketable
    contracts. Staff selection and management would be based on business
    practices; the project site would be situated where basic
    infrastructure is well developed and engineering industries
    established.

    Parabolic Trough Array
    Tehachapi, California, USA
    photo: US D.O.E.
    This project is consistent with the World Bank's Global Environment
    Fund's operational strategy on climate change in support of long-term
    mitigation measures. In particular, the project will help reduce the
    costs of proven parabolic trough solar technology so as to enhance its
    commercial viability. This initiative is part of an anticipated
    multi-country solar thermal promotion program, the objectives of which
    will be to accelerate the process of cost reduction and demonstrate
    the technology in a wider range of climate and market conditions.

    Demonstrating the solar plant's operational viability under Indian
    conditions is expected to result in follow-up investments by the
    private sector both in the manufacture of the solar field components
    and in larger solar stations within India.

    Insights into local design and operating factors such as
    meteorological and grid conditions, and use of available back-up
    fuels, are expected to lead to its replicability under Indian
    conditions, opening up avenues for larger deployment of solar power
    plants in India and other countries with limited access to cheap
    competing fuels. Creation of demand for large scale production of
    solar facilities will in turn lead to reductions in costs of equipment
    supply and operation. It is also expected to revive and sustain the
    interest of the international business and scientific community in
    improving systems designs and operations of solar thermal plants.

    The Project is expected to result in avoided annual emissions of
    714,400 tons of CO2, or 17.9 million tons over the life of the
    project, relative to generation from a similar-sized coal-fired power
    station. The cost of carbon avoidance is estimated at $6.5 per ton.

    The project involves: (i) Construction of a solar thermal/fossil-fuel
    hybrid power plant of about 140MW incorporating a parabolic trough
    solar thermal field of 35 MW to 40 MW; and (ii) Technical assistance
    package to support technology development and commercialization
    requirements.

    Location of Rajasthan
    Investment Component. The solar thermal/hybrid power station will
    comprise: (i) a solar field with a collection area of 219,000 square
    meters to support a 35MWe to 40MWe solar thermal plant; and (ii) a
    power block based on mature fossil fuel technology (i.e, regasified
    LNG). The proposed project will be sited at Mathania, near Jodhpur,
    Rajasthan in an arid region. In addition to high solar insulation
    levels (5.8 kWh/m2 daily average), the proposed site involves
    approximately 800,000 square meters of relatively level land with
    access to water resources and electric transmission facilities. The
    solar thermal/hybrid station will operate as a base load plant with an
    expected plant load factor of 80%. The final choice of the
    fossil-fired power block would be left to the bidders, subject to
    performance parameters set out in the tender specifications.

    The design choice is an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC)
    involving the integrated operation of the parabolic trough solar plant
    with a combined cycle gas turbine using naphtha. Such a plant would
    consist of the solar field; a combined cycle power block involving two
    gas turbines each connected to a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG)
    and a steam turbine connected to both HRSG; and ancillary facilities
    and plant services such as fire protection, regasified liquefied
    natural gas supply and storage system, grid interconnection system,
    water supply and treatment systems, etc. A control building will house
    a central microprocessor control system that monitors and controls
    plant operations.

    The success of the solar thermal/hybrid power plant as a demonstration
    project will determine if this technology is replicable in other parts
    of India. The project will provide technical assistance to ensure that
    adequate institutional and logistical support for the technology is
    available for future expansion of solar thermal power.

    Specifically, funds will be made available for promoting
    commercialization of solar thermal technologies among potential
    investors; staff training and development of a local consultancy base;
    upgrading of test facilities; mproved collection and measurement of
    solar insolation data and other solar resource mapping activities; and
    development of pipeline investments.

    The total cost of the investment component is estimated at US$ 201.5
    million, including interest during construction, physical and price
    contingencies as well as duties and taxes. Of these costs, the cost of
    supplies (excluding contingencies) for the solar component including
    the steam generator amounts to $41 million, and that for the
    conventional power plant component is $72 million. The cost of the
    technical assistance component for promoting replication of the solar
    power technology is estimated at $4 million.

    City Palace of Jaipur
    Rajasthan, India

    Investors Note: For more information on the solar thermal project in
    Rajasthan, India, please contact:

    Mr. G. L. Somani, General Manager
    Rajasthan State Power Corporation Ltd.
    E-166, Yudhisthar Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, India
    Telephone No.: (91-141) 384055
    Fax No.: (91-141) 382759

    About the Author: Gordon Feller is the CEO of Urban Age Institute
    (www.UrbanAge.org). During the past twenty years he has authored more
    than 500 magazine articles, journal articles or newspaper articles on
    the profound changes underway in politics, economics, and ecology -
    with a special emphasis on sustainable development. Gordon is the
    editor of Urban Age Magazine, a unique quarterly which serves as a
    global resource and which was founded in 1990. He can be reached at
    GordonFeller@UrbanAge.org and he is available for speaking to your
    organization about the issues raised in this and his other numerous
    articles published in EcoWorld.

    Ausra plant deal with PG&E

    Solar Startup Ausra Inks $1B Deal With PG&E
    Print All Articles Letter to the editor Podcast Listen to this
    article. Powered by Odiogo.com
    on 05 November 2007, 18:49
    by April Kilcrease

    Pacific Gas and Electric on Monday announced that it signed a
    177-megawatt solar thermal power purchasing agreement with Ausra.

    According to John O'Donnell, Ausra's executive vice president, the
    twenty-year agreement will generate over $1 billion in revenue for the
    Palo Alto, California-based start-up.

    The plant will be located in San Luis Obispo County, California, and
    is expected to begin generating power in 2010. Ausra has filed its
    application for certification for this plant with the California
    Energy Commission, which must grant approval before construction
    begins.

    PG&E supplies 12 percent of its energy from renewable sources, said
    Keely Wachs, PG&E's environmental communications manager.

    "PG&E continues to aggressively add renewable electric power
    resources" to its supply and the company is confident that it will
    meet or exceed its 20 percent renewable energy goal by 2010, he said.

    Proving that bigger isn't always better, the plant will use only one
    square mile of land and will burn no fuel, use minimal water, and have
    no air or water emissions.

    Ausra's Compact Linear Fresnel Reflector (CLFR) solar technology
    utilizes the heat from the sun's rays to create steam. Solar
    collectors boil water at high temperatures to power steam turbine
    generators.

    Because Ausra's flat mirrors–called Fresnel reflectors–are never more
    than eight feet off the ground, they cast shorter shadows that allow
    them to be built close together. This means Ausra only needs 2-2.5
    acres of land per megawatt compared with 5 acres per megawatt for
    solar trough systems or 7 acres per megawatt for solar dish engine
    systems, Mr. O'Donnell said.

    Compared with other power purchase agreements in California in the
    last few years, the new agreement with Ausra is among the smallest.

    According to Mr. Wachs, PG&E's 553-megawatt power purchase agreement
    with Solel-MSP-1, a subsidiary of Israel-based Solel Thermal Systems,
    in July is the single largest solar commitment in the world right now.

    PG&E has also entered an agreement with Oakland, California-based
    BrightSource Energy for a 500-megawatt plan to be announced soon.

    Although these agreements dwarf the deal with Ausra, New Energy
    Finance analyst Nathaniel Bullard said that Ausra is well-positioned.

    Other solar thermal energy projects such as Solel's Mojave Solar Park,
    to be constructed in California's Mojave Desert, will be far away from
    populated areas and the electric grid. Ausra's plant, to be located
    about ten miles north of Carrizo Plain National Monument, may get less
    sun than the Mojave Desert, but it will be directly under a PG&E
    transmission line,  O'Donnell said.

    Ausra's proposed plant will only need "850 feet to connect," said
    Bullard. They'll be able to "tap right into the electric grid. It's a
    lot less expensive and it speeds up the process."

    The high cost of the feeder and trunk lines required to connect to the
    grid from a long distance are often well outside of a smaller
    developer's range.

    By skirting the sometimes two-year-long Bureau of Land Management
    review process and eschewing the burden of proof required to build on
    public land, Ausra's decision to buy private land will also help speed
    up the process.

    "We're hoping to be the first to break ground," Mr. O'Donnell said.
    The plant, which will be built on dried out former farm land, will be
    "growing megawatts instead of wheat," he said.

    Perhaps Ausra's plant will prove that when it comes to cost and speed,
    size doesn't always matter in the race to solar thermal power.

    Mongolian Solar Thermal Power Plant

    Solar power plant under plan for Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
    By Mai Dou (China Daily)
    Updated: 2006-06-03 08:37

    Solar Millennium AG, a Germany-based solar energy technology company,
    is working with its Chinese counterpart to build a
    multi-billion-dollar solar power plant in North China.

    The firm, with the Inner Mongolia Ruyi Industry Co Ltd, is conducting
    a feasibility study for the project in Ordos of the northern Inner
    Mongolia Autonomous Region.

    Preparatory work will be completed for construction to begin by the
    end of the year, said Christian Beltle, chairman of Solar Millennium.

    When completed, the plant will be China's first large-scale commercial
    plant converting sunlight into electricity, industry experts said.

    The project, using solar-thermal technology provided by Solar
    Millennium AG, would have a capacity of 1,000 MW (megawatts) by 2020.

    Total investment would be about 20 billion yuan (US$2.5 billion),
    according to the company.

    An initial phase with a capacity of 50 MW would be built in "a short
    period" at a cost of around 1.3 billion yuan (US$162.5 million), said
    Wang Genshu, chairman of the Inner Mongolia Ruyi Industry Co Ltd.

    Wang said they would invite strategic investors to come forward, both
    domestic and foreign, when the National Development and Reform
    Commission (NDRC) gives the go-ahead for the project, possibly next
    year.

    "About 20 to 30 per cent of the total spending will be financed by
    investors, with the remaining coming from bank loans," Wang said.

    He said a few companies, including foreign ones, have shown strong
    interest in the solar project.

    Officials from the country's top five power companies, including
    Huaneng and Datang, were not available for comment.

    The German energy firm signed a framework agreement with its Chinese
    partner last month.

    The move marks Solar Millennium's first entry into the growing
    renewable market in China. It has clinched deals to build similar
    plants in other places such as Spain and the United States.

    "This is our pilot project in China; I consider this to be a
    forward-looking decision based on sharply-increasing energy demand in
    the country," said Beltle. "China is expected to become our largest
    market in three to four years."

    Analysts participating in the feasibility study said they had
    investigated three provinces in China, but finally selected Ordos in
    Inner Mongolia because of its water resources and abundant sunlight.

    Solar-thermal technology, different from the more-commonly-used
    photovoltaic cells that directly turn light into electricity, needs
    water to generate steam for power production, and is cheaper in terms
    of construction costs, experts said.

    Ma Shenghong, a professor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said the
    Ordos solar plant would sell its electricity for 1.5-1.6 yuan (18.8-20
    US cents) per kilowatt-hour to the grid companies.

    China, the world's second-biggest energy consumer after the United
    States, is pushing the use of renewable energy sources such as wind
    and solar to generate electricity. At the beginning of the year the
    government passed the country's first law on renewable energies.

    Beijing aims to increase renewable consumption in the energy mix from
    the current 7 per cent to 15 per cent by 2020.

    China's major power companies have been ordered to ensure 5 per cent
    of their electricity generators are fuelled by renewable energy
    sources by 2010, Zhang Guobao, vice-minister of the NDRC, the nation's
    top economic planning body, has said.

    Investor Khosla: Clean energy only matters when it meets 'China price'

    Investor Khosla: Clean energy only matters when it meets 'China price'
    Posted by Martin LaMonica | 2 comments

    WASHINGTON--Famed venture capitalist Vinod Khosla told energy and
    environmental ministers from around the world they greatly
    underestimate how rapidly energy is moving toward renewable sources.

    Khosla was a speaker during the ministerial plenary at the Washington
    International Renewable Energy Conference (WIREC) 2008 here on
    Tuesday, where he argued that the energy industry is undergoing a
    technology disruption, much the way that telecom and computing did
    decades ago.

    Vinod Khosla argues that people underestimate the pace of technology
    change in energy.
    (Credit: Martin LaMonica/CNET Networks)

    The reason people don't appreciate the pace of change is faulty
    projections, he said. Government officials and businesspeople trust
    market forecasts which have consistently been far off-base.

    People believed that it would take decades for mobile phones to become
    widespread, but it happened much quicker because they had mistakenly
    assumed that the phones would remain the same as the original clunky
    prototypes. McKinsey forecast that there would be less than 1 million
    cell phones sold between 1980 and 2000, when the actual number was
    more like 109 million.

    "We are repeating the same mistakes in energy," Khosla said. "It's
    hard for people to imagine what energy will look like in 10 or 15
    years."

    Because technology change happens faster than most people anticipate,
    he believes that several renewable energy technologies will become
    cost-competitive within five or ten years.

    He forecast electricity production at the same price as fossil fuel
    power plants, biofuels from non-food sources at $1 a gallon,
    high-efficiency engines and lighting, and carbon neutral cement
    production.

    "All these technologies are in development today. Oil will have to be
    $35 per gallon to compete," he said.

    Underlying his assumptions, however, is a rapid adoption of these
    energy technologies.

    To achieve these cost efficiencies, new energy technologies have to
    pass what Khosla calls the "Chindia test." That is, the need to be
    cheap enough for China, India, and other developing countries to
    purchase.

    That scale will accelerate technology development and adoption, he
    argued. Expensive products like plug-in hybrid cars, which may be the
    darlings of environmentalists, simply won't drive large-scale change,
    he said.

    "Plug-in hybrids are irrelevant because they are too expensive. Unless
    you can make 500 million or 800 million of those, it won't matter," he
    said.

    His contention that plug-in hybrids are irrelevant, or "toys," a case
    he made late last year at a conference, brought fierce criticism from
    environmentalists.

    Although a longtime denizen of Silicon Valley, Khosla is no stranger
    to Washington, D.C., where he has presented to congresspeople and
    lobbied for supportive policies.

    The U.S. government should boost investment in research and technology
    and implement regulations that put a price on carbon emissions, he
    said.

    Clearly an optimist, Khosla ticked off a number of technologies he has
    invested in that could shift the energy industry from fossil fuels,
    including solar thermal power, cellulosic ethanol, advanced
    geothermal, synthetic liquid fuels, and energy efficiency.

    "We are mounting a war on oil, a war on coal, a war for efficiency and
    renewable materials," he said.

    Brightsource FAQs

    THREE QUICK FACTS ABOUT BRIGHTSOURCE ENERGY'S SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS

      1. The Ivanpah Solar Power Complex that BrightSource is building
    near the California/Nevada border in the Mojave Desert will power
    250,000 homes and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by over
    500,000 tons per year.

      2. BrightSource's 400MW Ivanpah Solar Power Complex will produce
    more electricity in one year than the total of all of the residential
    solar installations currently installed in the US. [Note: Ivanpah is
    the only utility-scale solar project currently under development in
    the US that has reached this advanced permitting stage.]

      3. If BrightSource Energy plants were built on less than 2% of the
    land in the Mojave Desert, they would provide enough power for all of
    the homes in California and reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by
    over 30 million tons per year.


    TEN FAQS ABOUT SOLAR THERMAL POWER
    1. What is the difference between the terms "solar thermal power,"
    "concentrating solar power," and "CSP"?

    Solar thermal power is sometimes called concentrating solar power or
    CSP.  These labels refer to technologies that use the energy of the
    sun to produce steam, directly or indirectly.  The steam is then piped
    to a convention power generation system to make electricity.  The
    difference between a solar thermal plant and a conventional
    fossil-fueled power plant is that conventional plants create steam by
    burning fuels that release carbon into the atmosphere.

    2. What is the difference between solar thermal power plants and
    photovoltaic (also known as PV) systems?

    Solar thermal power plants, often also called Concentrating Solar
    Power (CSP) plants, use sunlight to produce steam, which is then used
    to generate electricity.  By contrast, photovoltaic (also known as PV)
    systems use special panels to collect sunlight and convert it directly
    to electricity.  "Thermal" refers to the fact that it is the heat of
    the sunlight that is used, and "concentrating" refers to the fact that
    solar thermal systems concentrate the sunlight, in much the same way
    that a magnifying glass does, to harness its heat.
    Solar thermal plants are large utility-scale projects that generate
    enough power to serve tens of thousands of homes.  Their power is
    usually sold to public utilities, which then sell it to their
    customers.  Photovoltaic systems are usually much smaller and are
    usually installed on residences, schools, or office buildings.

    3. Where can solar thermal plants be built?

    In theory, a solar thermal plant can be built anywhere that the sun
    shines, however cost considerations dictate that they be built in
    areas of high solar radiation – a measure of how much power can be
    generated in a single square meter of surface area in a typical year.
    The best solar radiation is found in high desert areas, such as the
    Mojave Desert in Southern California, where the sun shines reliably
    330 to 350 days a year.  Another major consideration is that solar
    plants need to be built in the vicinity of power transmission lines
    serving markets large enough to use all of the power generated by the
    plant.

    4. How much land do solar thermal plants require?

    The answer depends on two factors:  a) the solar insularity (see FAQ
    3) of the plant location, and b) the specific technology being used.
    In general, a typical 100 MW solar thermal plant will occupy 600 to
    800 acres.  Installing solar power plants on an area covering only 1%
    of the Mojave Desert would provide enough solar power to serve 75% of
    the homes in California.

    5. How much are atmospheric carbon emissions reduced by solar thermal
    power plants?

    Carbon emissions are reduced by 600 pounds for each MW hour of solar
    power that displaces an equal amount of fossil-fuel power.  Installing
    solar power plants on an area covering 1% of the Mojave Desert would
    reduce annual carbon emissions by over 20 million tons.

    6. Is solar thermal power reliable and available when needed most -
    during peak demand hours?

    The peak demand period for electricity is the hottest part of the day,
    when air conditioners are running in offices and homes.  This is the
    same time of day when solar power is produced.  In addition, because
    sunshine is reliable and consistent in the desert areas where solar
    power plants are typically built solar power is also consistent and
    reliable. Conversely, another common form of renewable power
    production, wind power, normally has its peak production period during
    the nighttime hours, and is much less predictable and reliable.

    7. Are there ways to use solar power to provide electricity power both
    day and night?

    Unlike the photovoltaic systems typically installed on rooftops, CSP
    plants produce their electricity by first producing steam then using
    that steam to generate electricity.  Thus, CSP plants can be fitted
    with gas-fired boilers to produce steam when the sun is not shining,
    enabling the plants to produce electricity at any time.  This provides
    valuable back-up generation capacity to utility companies for use when
    wind power is not available, or demand is unusually high. Another
    method is to install thermal storage to store heat during the daylight
    hours and release that heat during the night to make electricity.  At
    this time, such storage systems are not economical, but it is
    anticipated that the cost will come down and make the use of solar
    power viable around-the-clock.

    8. Will the cost of electricity produced by CSP plants vary in the future?

    The cost of fuel represents about 60% of the cost of producing
    electricity from fossil-fueled plants.  CSP plants require no fuel,
    thus the cost of the power they produce is not affected by the
    vagaries and risks associated with fossil fuel prices. Other than very
    slight increases in maintenance and operating expenses due to
    inflation, the cost of power produced by a CSP plant will not change
    over its economic life.

    9. How does the cost of electricity produced by CSP plants compare to
    the cost of electricity produced by fossil fuel plants?

    Solar thermal power is probably cheaper than power from fossil fuels
    when all cost externalities are considered.  While many of the costs
    of fossil fuels are well known, others (pollution related health
    problems, environmental degradation, the impact on national security
    from relying on foreign energy sources) are indirect and difficult to
    calculate. These are traditionally external to the pricing system, and
    are thus often referred to as externalities. In order to better
    control this matter, legislative and regulatory bodies are moving to
    require the sequestration of carbon to keep it out of the atmosphere,
    or apply a corrective pricing mechanism, such as a carbon tax, to
    fossil-fueled power plants.  Either measure will lead to the cost of
    solar thermal power becoming cheaper to the consumer than fossil fuel
    based energy.

    Even without pricing cost externalities, the cost of solar thermal
    power is going down.  As more plants are built and technologies
    improve, this price should continuously drop over the next ten years
    with the result that the price of solar power seems likely to be in
    the same range as power from fossil fueled plants, even without carbon
    emissions costs considered.

    10. How does today's regulatory environment impact the development of
    solar energy plants?

    The combination of environmental concerns and persistently higher
    prices for commodity fuels has caused a number of states to adopt
    Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) that require their utilities to
    purchase as much as 33% of their power from renewable energy sources
    such as wind, hydro and solar by specified dates.  These and other
    regulatory mandates including federal mandates and tax incentives
    provide an environment conducive to the development of alternative
    energy solutions and make the building of solar power plants cost
    effective.

    A favorable governmental and regulatory climate makes the delivery of
    renewable energies possible.  And, these requirements, such as the RPS
    in place for California that requires utilities to purchase 20% of its
    power from renewable sources by 2011 and 33% by 2017, help to
    encourage utilities to make the development of alternative energy
    sources possible.






    TEN FAQS ABOUT BRIGHTSOURCE ENERGY
    1. What is BrightSource Energy Inc.?

    BrightSource Energy, Inc. designs and builds large scale solar power
    plants that can deliver low-cost solar energy in the form of steam and
    or electricity to industrial and utility customers worldwide at prices
    competitive with fossil fuels.  BrightSource Energy enables industrial
    and utility customers to lessen their dependency on fossil fuels by
    providing a cost effective clean source of power during periods of
    peak usage.

    2. When and where was BrightSource Energy founded?  By whom?

    BrightSource Energy was founded as Luz II in 2004 by Arnold Goldman.
    Mr. Goldman has been in the solar energy field for over twenty years
    and was the founder and CEO of Luz International Ltd., which built
    nine large solar power plants in the 1980s   In 2004 Mr. Goldman
    reassembled a number of members of the original Luz International
    executive and technical team and founded Luz II to develop a new solar
    energy technology to take advantage of renewed interest in the use of
    renewable energy to produce electricity and regulatory / legislative
    support of such projects.

    In 2006, the name of the company was changed from Luz II, Inc. to
    BrightSource Energy, Inc.  The Luz II name was retained by
    BrightSource's wholly owned subsidiary in Israel, which is responsible
    for engineering and development, and the supply of solar fields for
    BrightSource plants.

    3. Where does BrightSource Energy's financing come from?

    BrightSource Energy is a privately held company. Its principal
    investors include: VantagePoint Venture Partners, Morgan Stanley,
    Draper Fisher Jurvetson, J.P. Morgan, And Chevron Technology Ventures.

    4. What was Luz International?  What are SEGS?

    Luz International was the solar technology company that successfully
    designed, built, financed, and operated nine solar energy plants in
    Southern California between 1984 and 1991. Luz International remains
    to this day, as the only company in the world to have built
    large-scale commercial solar thermal projects – the 350 MW SEGS
    projects in the Mojave Desert – which are still in operation today.

    SEGS is the acronym for Solar Electricity Generating Stations, which
    was the name given to the type of power plants built by Luz
    International in the Mojave Desert in Southern California between 1984
    and 1991.  Fifteen of the key members of the Luz International
    engineering and commercial team that built those SEGS are now key
    members of the BrightSource team.

    5. How does a BrightSource Energy power plant work?

    Unlike solar photovoltaic technologies, which convert sunlight
    directly to electricity through silicon or other solid-state
    materials, BrightSource Energy's solar thermal technology converts
    sunlight to heat, in the form of steam or hot air that is then used to
    drive a turbine to produce electricity.  The technology used by
    BrightSource is called Distributed Power Tower, or DPT.

    6. How does DPT work?

    DPT™ stands for Distributed Power Tower and is a BrightSource design
    based on the solar power tower concept proven by the DOE Solar I and
    Solar II projects in the 1980s.  The innovations that BrightSource has
    brought to the power tower design make it far less expensive to build
    and more efficient in its production of electricity.

    A DPT solar field, known as a Solar Power Cluster (SPC), consists of
    an array of thousands of relatively small flat glass mirrors placed in
    the desert and an associated power tower and receiver (solar boiler)
    which converts the light received into useful heat.  These mirrors
    reflect sunlight onto the collection surface of the solar boiler
    approximately 300 feet in the air on top of a tower.  The concentrated
    sunlight focused on the collection surface is used to directly heat
    steam, which then drives a turbine/generator to produce electricity.

    7. How does the BrightSource solar thermal solution compare to other
    renewable energy resources and to other solar energy solutions?

    A properly located and constructed solar power plant is a more
    desirable source of power generation for utilities than other types of
    renewable energy, such as wind plants, because solar plants produce
    the greatest amount of power at the time when the demand on the
    utility is greatest – sunny afternoons.  A BrightSource DPT plant has
    a further advantage in that it can be fitted with auxiliary boilers,
    which will enable them to reliably supply electricity to the grid
    during both solar and non-solar hours, and during any extended period
    of solar disruption.

    8. Does this solution mean that photovoltaic systems make no sense?

    Both photovoltaic systems and solar thermal systems have a role to
    play.  Photovoltaic installations are well suited for individual
    installations in residences and small commercial or industrial
    facilities where they complement and supplement energy supplied by
    public utilities.  By contrast, solar thermal installations are
    designed to provide large quantities of power for direct sale to
    public utilities to reduce the need for electricity produced by fossil
    fuel power plants.
    9. How does the cost of energy from a BrightSource Energy solar
    thermal plant compare to the cost of electricity provided by a PV
    system?

    Solar thermal power, using BrightSource's DPT solar technology can be
    produced for about half the cost of electricity produced by
    photovoltaic systems, making solar thermal the lowest-cost form of
    solar power yet available.  The economy of scale and lack of costly
    specialized materials will allow BrightSource plants to achieve the
    lowest cost of solar electricity in the world.

    10. How does BrightSource Energy's approach differ from other solar
    thermal solutions?  Is it better?  Is it more efficient?

    BrightSource's DPT technology has several significant advantages over
    other solar thermal technologies:  a) unlike most solar thermal
    technologies, DPT plants produce steam directly from solar energy, b)
    the steam has a much higher temperature (550° C vs 380° C), which
    results in more efficient operation, c) the mirrors that reflect the
    sunlight move in two dimensions to follow the sun during the day and
    during the seasons (other technologies only move in one dimension), d)
    the glass used in the mirrors is less expensive because it is flat,
    not curved, and e) DPT solar fields can be installed on uneven or
    sloping ground.

    11. How does DPT technology differ from the technology used in the
    original SEGS plants?

    The solar fields for the SEGS plants built by Luz International
    utilize long rows of curved glass mirrors to heat synthetic oil, which
    is piped to a heat exchanger to produce steam at about 375° C.  This
    steam is used to drive a steam turbine to produce electricity.  By
    contrast, the DPT 550 technology uses thousands of small flat glass
    mirrors (known as heliostats) to focus sunlight on a solar boiler
    located on top of a tower.  The sunlight heats steam directly to a
    temperature of about 550° C and the steam is used to drive a steam
    turbine to produce electricity.